While some of the iCloud features are obviously useful (iCloud backup, for instance) I am baffled by Photo Stream. I can see why it might be useful to sync your Contacts from multiple devices to a central "cloud" location. But why would anybody want an unfiltered, unmanageable stream of pictures from multiple devices constantly appearing on their iPhone?
Apple has a very cute video on their website showing how a family might use this feature. Mom takes a bunch of adorable pictures of the kids' soccer game on her iphone and then heads home. As soon as the minivan pulls up at the door, little tike races inside and excitedly opens up the family iPad to see the pictures. Awww. But think about it. Does Mom ONLY use her iPhone camera for pictures of the kids? Does she really want every picture she takes to be streamed instantly to the iPad? The 2 dozen pictures she took at Marge's going-away lunch, the bar-code she scanned while shopping, the accidental picture of her foot? And if that iPad has a camera in it and the kids start playing with it, she could open up her iPhone Photo app tomorrow and find 500 pictures of the family cat.
The one scenario I can think of where Photostream would be cool is as a one-way conduit between your iPhone and your computer. If you're the type of photographer who likes to take a lot of pictures without really looking at them and then sort them out later on the computer, it would be great.
But I just don't see the advantage of syncing all the pictures both ways from the cloud to every device in the household.
This isn't a hater thread. Photo Stream is a cool technology, and I'm sure that it could be good for something with a little tweaking. And if it's never useful to me, nobody is making me enable it. I'm just curious to know if people are finding it to be useful in its current state. And if not, what would make it something that you would want to use?
Apple has a very cute video on their website showing how a family might use this feature. Mom takes a bunch of adorable pictures of the kids' soccer game on her iphone and then heads home. As soon as the minivan pulls up at the door, little tike races inside and excitedly opens up the family iPad to see the pictures. Awww. But think about it. Does Mom ONLY use her iPhone camera for pictures of the kids? Does she really want every picture she takes to be streamed instantly to the iPad? The 2 dozen pictures she took at Marge's going-away lunch, the bar-code she scanned while shopping, the accidental picture of her foot? And if that iPad has a camera in it and the kids start playing with it, she could open up her iPhone Photo app tomorrow and find 500 pictures of the family cat.
The one scenario I can think of where Photostream would be cool is as a one-way conduit between your iPhone and your computer. If you're the type of photographer who likes to take a lot of pictures without really looking at them and then sort them out later on the computer, it would be great.
But I just don't see the advantage of syncing all the pictures both ways from the cloud to every device in the household.
This isn't a hater thread. Photo Stream is a cool technology, and I'm sure that it could be good for something with a little tweaking. And if it's never useful to me, nobody is making me enable it. I'm just curious to know if people are finding it to be useful in its current state. And if not, what would make it something that you would want to use?
Last edited: